Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic)
System design, protocol architecture, prosecution strategy
VerSky™ exists because the bottleneck for new aerospace standards is no longer technical — it's authorship bandwidth. This is a deliberate experiment in solving that bottleneck.
Engineer by training. Builder by disposition. Based in Bangkok, Thailand.
Spent the last decade running multiple businesses across hospitality, software, and AI infrastructure. Came to aerospace not by industry affiliation but by recognising that a generation of low-altitude vehicles was being built without the protocol layer they would need.
Filed both VerSky patents Pro Se with USPTO on February 27, 2026 — without a patent attorney, without a startup, without a team. Authored the specification, claims, drawings, IDS, and 35+ rounds of internal review using an orchestrated workflow of four AI collaborators.
“The hardest part of an open protocol isn't the protocol — it's the patience to publish it before the standards body asks for it.”
Each AI has a defined role with hard boundaries. The human is the orchestrator and the only signatory on every USPTO filing. Below is the actual workflow, not marketing.
System design, protocol architecture, prosecution strategy
Code generation, schema implementation, refactor execution
Adversarial review, claim audit, GO/NO-GO decisions
Translation, documentation, ecosystem integration
Every USPTO filing is signed by Jittapol Prukpatarakul. AIs draft, audit, and review — they do not file. Per USPTO guidance (Nov 2025), AI-assisted patent prosecution is permitted and disclosure of AI tooling is not required.
The next decade will see an order-of-magnitude increase in low-altitude flight density — drones, eVTOLs, autonomous helicopters, hobbyist quadcopters — all sharing airspace that was never designed for them.
Without a shared protocol, the industry defaults to vendor-locked stacks (one operator, one fleet, one airspace) — which doesn't scale, and which incumbents will use to entrench.
VerSky exists to make sure the alternative — an open, patent-protected protocol with a permissive reference implementation — is on the table when regulators and standards bodies decide.
The cost of a US non-provisional patent application drafted by a top-tier firm is ~$15,000–$30,000 per application. For two protocol patents that would be roughly $50,000 before the first Office Action.
Filing Pro Se — using AI tooling for drafting and adversarial review — cost $800 in USPTO fees for two applications under Micro Entity status.
The point isn't the cost saving. The point is proof of method: if a single careful human and modern tooling can author a 100+ page patent specification with 40+ claims, then the protocol can be authored — and adopted — by anyone.
The standards-body engagement plan in Phase 4 is built on the same assumption.